Daft questions

She’s up on the ceiling again. I’ve just put the ladder away for the third time this week.  

I’ve taught and trained a lot of young journalists over the years. From headlines to lead writing, context to nugraphs, the inverted pyramid structure to quotes and paraphrasing. From news writing to feature writing, from analysis to updates to wrap-ups, night-leads and lead-alls.

One thing I used to spend a lot of time on was the art of asking a good question. I just heard a few examples - coming from the ceiling - of Uncle Chen’s press conference and I’m afraid I started losing the will to live.

It’s important to stress that there is no such thing as a stupid question. But there is such a thing as people asking stupid questions just for the sake of it. 

I hate to bash the media, and I fully understand that reporters are under huge pressure from editors to try and squeeze anything new out of any interaction with someone as important as a minister. 

But the kind of questions I just heard being asked were really beyond ridiculous. It’s no wonder Chen looked genuinely puzzled trying to think down to the level of some of them. 

‘After coming up from scuba-diving you are on the beach and you don’t have a mask, will you get fined if you have to walk across a stretch of beach to get a mask from where you left your stuff?’

Chen came back and basically said use a zipper bag, because he had to say something. If it had been me I would have said “For God’s sake, just use your common sense.”

There is no black and white in all this and it saddens me that reporters with such easy and regular access to someone at Ministerial level, a luxury not enjoyed in many countries even in the midst of the pandemic, can’t come up with questions that actually challenge him.

And finally, It is the style around the world that all the reporters at something like a Ministerial briefing that is broadcast nationally that they identify themselves and the media organisation they represent when they ask a question.  

 Tinkerty Tonk...

《 蠢問題》 她又黏在天花板上了，這是我這個星期第三次把用完的梯子收起來。 多年來，我訓練過很多年輕記者。從標題 (headlines) 到第一段 (lead writing)，從上下文 (context) 到核心段落 (nugraphs)，從倒金字塔結構 (inverted pyramid structure) 到引用和轉述 (quotes and paraphrasing)，從新聞寫作 (news writing) 到專題寫作 (feature writing)，從分析 (analysis) 到更新(updates) 到綜合 (wrap-ups) 再到總結 (night-leads and lead-alls)。 (譯者註：這是通訊社的寫法，不過基本原則大致適用於所有新聞寫作) 我花了很多時間和受訓記者討論如何提出好問題的藝術，剛剛我從天花板上聽到陳叔叔的記者會上的幾個例子，我覺得我開始失去活下去的意志。 要注意，沒有愚蠢的問題。 但是有人提出愚蠢問題，好像只是為了要開口問。 記者是我一輩子的職業所以其實我討厭抨擊媒體，而且我完全理解記者承受著來自編輯的巨大壓力，想盡千方百計要從與部長這樣重要的人的任何互動中，擠出點新東西來。 但我剛剛聽到的一些問題真的是太荒謬了，難怪陳叔叔看起來很困惑，並且試圖降低到其中一些人的水準去回答。 “潛水回來後走在海灘上，你沒有戴口罩，如果得穿過沙灘到你放東西的地方取口罩，會被罰款嗎？” 陳叔叔基本上回答用拉鍊袋，因為他得回答記者的問題。如果是我，我會說：“看在上帝的份上，用你的常識吧。” 這一切都不是非黑即白，但令我感到難過的是，台灣記者能夠如此輕鬆而且定期接觸到部長級別的人，即使在疫情大流行期間，在許多國家是一種奢侈，但他們卻無法提出可以挑戰他的嚴肅問題。 最後，記者參加向全國廣播的部長級記者會，提問時表明自己和代表媒體的身份，是國際慣例。 Tinkerty Tonk… 掰掰。

God Complex

It’s always worrying when a person in a position of authority who makes decisions that affect the lives of many, gets delusional about their own abilities. 

Generally speaking it ends badly for everyone involved when such a person reaches the stage when you could start to describe it as a God Complex. It is generally accompanied by feelings of paranoia and thinking that things are only going wrong, or you are unpopular because you are being unfairly attacked. 

Seldom does the victim consider it might be something they are doing, or not doing, that is at fault - because they think they are way smarter than anyone around them.

It is defined thus - A god complex is an unshakable belief characterized by consistently inflated feelings of personal ability, privilege, or infallibility. A person with a god complex may refuse to admit the possibility of their error or failure, even in the face of irrefutable evidence. God complex is not a clinical term nor diagnosable disorder.

For example, if an official with oversight over a large area were asked if they were doing a good job. If that person said they would rate themselves 95 out of a 100, I would seriously start to wonder if this particular person had any self awareness at all. 

If that same person saw their popularity rating go from 70 pct to 30 pct but blamed this only on attacks by rivals, I would again wonder if massive delusion and paranoia was kicking in - in a serious way. 

This person might also never want to admit that anyone could help them and might even go so far as to take credit for something someone else had clearly helped with to get a good result. 

Some country leaders suffer from God Complex. Trump certainly did, Boris Johnson does not. Trump surrounded himself with ‘yes men’ while Boris Johnson has an army of advisors. 

Whether Johnson listens to them or not is beside the point and he is clearly a buffoon. But he doesn’t claim to be doing a 95 percent good job and doesn’t set himself up as a Doctor who is expert in every field of medicine, or a scientist, or a near perfect administrator.

One thing Johnson does that does fit the God Complex mould is he appoints those with limited intellectual capacity in positions around him so they will never be a threat...which is paranoid behaviour.  

Every would-be politician has to possess a huge ego as it goes with the turf. But any person who thinks they can do little wrong, is vastly superior to anyone else and tries to convince everyone they are some kind of genius really needs to be steered away from positions of authority.

Usually, voters are smart enough to spot these kind of people, or get rid of them at the ballot box when the God Complex manifests itself. 

Tinkerty Tonk..

《 上帝情結 》

當一個有權做出影響許多人生活決定的人，對自己的能力產生妄想時，總是令人擔憂。

當這樣的人到達你開始將其描述為上帝情結 (God Complex) 的階段時，結局對所有相關人士都會很糟糕。偏執通常伴隨而來，他們認為凡事都不對勁，或者他們不受歡迎只是因為遭受不公平的攻擊。

此類受害者很少認為這可能是他們正在做，或根本沒有做的事情有錯 －因為他們認為自己比周圍的任何人都聰明。

上帝情結的定義是這樣的，是一種不可動搖的信念，其特徵是對個人能力、特權或永不出錯的感覺持續膨脹。即使面對無可辯駁的證據，有上帝情結的人還是會拒絕承認任何他們出錯或失敗的可能性。上帝情結不是臨床術語，也不是可診斷的疾病。

例如一位在一般認知裡有不少疏失的官員，被問及是否把工作做好時，給自己打了 95 分，我會認真地開始懷疑這個人是否有任何自我意識。

如果同一個人看到自己受歡迎的程度從 70% 下降到 30%，卻將這個結果完全歸咎於競爭對手的攻擊，我會再次懷疑大規模的妄想和偏執，正在嚴重發生。

這個人也可能永遠不想承認有任何人可以提供協助，甚至可能會在其他人幫助取得成果後，認為那是自己的成就。

國家領導人通常有上帝情結的毛病。川普當然有，強生相較之下沒有。川普周圍有不少只會對著他說是的人，強生則是有一大批顧問。

這裡的重點並不是強生是否聽從顧問的建議，因為他顯然只是個小丑，但他並沒有聲稱他把應做的工作做到了 95%，也沒有自詡為“醫生”，而這個醫生顯然也是各個領域的專家、科學家或近乎完美的管理者。

不過強生倒是做了一件符合上帝情結模式的事，那就是他在身邊安插了一些智力有限的人，這樣他們就永遠不會成為威脅……這是一種偏執的行為。

每個想成為政治家的人都有一個巨大自我，但是任何認為自己幾乎不會做錯事、遠勝於任何人，並試圖說服每個人他們是某種天才的人，絕對需要遠離權位。

通常選民是夠聰明的，可以發現這類人，或者在上帝情結顯現時從投票箱中將他們除掉。

Tinkerty Tonk...掰掰。

Having Hysterics

Have you ever watched someone have hysterics? Maybe not, as it’s quite rare to witness it. 

It is defined as someone being “affected by or deriving from wildly uncontrolled emotion.”

From what I hear about the TMD and KMT’s most recent outbursts, both of them must be borderline hysterical because they are so frustrated at people laughing at their efforts to score political points. 

It’s like watching mad Uncle Roger at a family wedding drinking an entire bottle of Baijiu and yelling abuse at everyone towards the end of the evening.  

From what I hear, our Olympic hopeful the Badminton Princess sent a selfie from the plane and said how much she missed travelling business class. Even for a short 3 hour 15 minute flight it would have been nice, but the real implications quickly became apparent, and it turned out that half the Olympic committee were in business class. 

That is utterly shameful and it is them who should be criticized. There have been enough stories over the years of corruption surrounding the Olympics and Tokyo has been no different with all sorts of allegations now flying around. 

It is quite right to call out the Olympic committee and there should be an investigation on how this happened and if indeed the Athletes were treated as second class to the officials, coaches and doctors.

According to the Olympic Charter, every National Olympic Committee (NOC) must be free from government interference. But surveys have shown that at least one in seven NOCs have leaders with formal ties to their national governments.

The official in charge of sport affairs has offered to resign. Quite right too. Maybe there is a lesson here given the Olympic Charter, and Taiwan should quickly act to completely separate the NOC here from the Government.  

All well and good. An opposition doing its job and calling something out that needed calling out.

But then like a boxer who has landed a few punches, they started showboating and became massively overconfident and began to swing wildly. 

HOW DARE THE GOVERNMENT PUT HER IN A ROOM LIKE THAT? They screamed when Badminton Girl sent a picture of her hotel room. 

Their screaming fits of rage quickly turned to red-faced embarrassment when she meekly told everyone she chose that particular hotel because it was nearer the training ground than the other hotels on offer. 

Did it not occur to them to check? Clearly not...sorry, that was a rhetorical question. I seem to be asking rhetorical questions a lot lately like “Are they stupid?” “Do they not think?” “Are these people eight years old?”

Then came the food. HOW CAN YOU POSSIBLY GIVE HER FOOD LIKE THAT? They screamed at the government. 

There was even one young KMT official who set himself up as some kind of athlete's nutritional expert and opined that the contents of the bento box were not what an athlete would eat. As someone who is quite clearly not that cautious about what he pushes into his face, I have to wonder if he should be setting himself up as some kind of advisor on what Olympian Miss Tai should, or should not be eating. 

The KMT often lets itself down by allowing these kinds of people to publicly air their views. They need better thinkers in these positions, and certainly more mature ones.   

Er, the bento box came from The Okura Hotel, one of the finest hotels in Tokyo and Tai was more than happy with it. I was lucky enough to have stayed there on more than one occasion when I was a senior editor and very nice it was too. 

On top of that, with a simple check on the Okura website, some bento boxes cost over 10,000 yen which is about TW$ 2,500. Yes guys, that was a real slap in the face pointing that one out. 

Talk about an unedifying episode. The amount of egg on their faces is truly laughable and pretty much negates any good they did raising the issue of the flight. 

Any coach will tell you don’t get cocky, and don’t celebrate too early...it’s a great way to lose or look stupid.  

What really worries me about all this is the heavy politicising of everything that moves, and in this case sport. They have already heavily politicised healthcare through Covid and are proving yet again they are simply desperate to lower themselves to the level of a bar brawl pretty much every day. 

Having an opposition that is ineffective at doing what it is supposed to be doing in terms of keeping the government of the day accountable and coming up with constructive criticism and not just throwing ill-thought out insults with no checking of facts.

In this ugly case the flight news was scandalous, rightly called out and there should be resignations and a change in government policy on how the Olympic committee here operates. After that, they should have shut up and avoided embarrassing themselves by dragging it on and on.   

I can only hope that by doing all this they have not upset poor Miss Tai who has been working and training for most of her life towards this Olympics. She needs to be as mentally prepared for her moment as she needs to be physically prepared.  

I can only hope they haven’t ruined her chances by dragging her into this protracted nonsense as ridiculous politicians desperately try to score political points and use her as a weapon. 

I would beg the Taiwan media in Tokyo not to ask her questions about all this. 

We need to leave her alone and allow her to get her head in the right space and not looking at her phone the whole time in case another political storm has blown up around her.   

I wish her the very best of luck.  

Tinkerty Tonk… 

Dunning-Kruger Effect

Much has been written about the Dunning Kruger effect and how it manifests itself in the senior officials and government leaders that control our daily lives. A simple Google search will amply demonstrate just how much thought has been given to the issue in recent years. 

Only the other day while I was disentangling Mrs Smith from the rather nice spotlight rail we have over the dining room table, and she was gibbering something about... “95%, he actually said 95%!”

Of course I have no idea who on earth she was talking about. But my not inconsiderable Sherlock Holmes qualities quickly kicked-in and I deduced that she might be talking about someone in the upper echelon of the administration in Taiwan. You see Watson, it was a simple deduction even when the subject is gibbering incoherently, sweating, and clearly very angry.

For those of you unfamiliar with Dunning-Kruger, I would encourage you to look it up.

I frankly think the best definition pops up when you do a simple Google search <dunning kruger effect>...if you can’t be arsed to do it yourself, Secret Squirrel is always here to lift the burden on your Sunday afternoon relaxation. It is this…    

“The Dunning–Kruger effect is a hypothetical cognitive bias stating that people with low ability at a task overestimate their ability. ... It is related to the cognitive bias of illusory superiority and comes from people's inability to recognize their lack of ability.”

Which is the kind of complicated bullshit you would expect from a couple of psychologists to come up with. It broadly means - some arseholes think they are WAY SMARTER than they actually are.  

It was then, Watson, I started to narrow down what the gibbering, sweating and angry wreck of a human being at my feet by the dining room table was ranting in her fits of rage. Could it be - she was talking about someone in a position of power in Taiwan, or even Taipei? 

So after a night of pawing through psychology books, while puffing on my pipe the whole time in proper Sherlock Holmes fashion...(I tried to lean on the mantlepiece and at the same time looking pensive, but we only have air conditioning so It didn’t really work…) I came across a whole bunch of companies who sell services aimed at getting the best from those who are having problems with their leadership abilities.  

Broadly speaking they all agree…I took this example from one of them and would like to thank Aubrey Daniels International (ADI) and in particular Bryan Shelton who wrote the article. ADI provides leadership development expertise and behavioral technology to improve businesses and their culture. (Full disclosure - I never have had, and currently do not have any relationship with either ADI or Bryan Shelton…. It just popped up on the internet when I did a search) 

The main things they point to as problems with those in leadership positions who are not performing well are -

1. Being vague
2. Praising results without understanding how they were produced
3. Over-relying on fear and intimidation
4. Only seeing the world from their point of view

You don't have to be Sherlock Holmes to work out who we are talking about here...

Tinkerty tonk...

《 鄧寧克魯格效應 》 關於鄧寧克魯格效應 (Dunning-Kruger effect)，簡稱鄧克效應（DK effect)，以及這個現象如何在控制我們日常生活的政府人物或是領導者身上顯現出來，簡單的谷歌搜索就可以發現，近年來對這個現象的研究不勝枚舉。 就在前幾天，當我把史密斯太太從餐桌上方相當漂亮的吊燈桿上解救下來時，她還在胡言亂語：“95 分，他真的說他做到了 95分！” 我當然不知道她到底在說誰，但我那不容小覷的福爾摩斯特質很快就發揮了作用。我推斷她可能在談論台灣政府高層的某個人。 華生醫生你看，這是一個簡單的推論，即使這個線索語無倫次、滿頭大汗，而且顯然非常生氣。 對於那些不熟悉鄧克效應 (Dunning-Kruger effect) 的人，我建議你查一下。 坦白說最好的定義會在你做一個簡單的谷歌搜索動作時，立刻跳出螢幕。不過如果你懶到不能自己動手，松鼠特務總是在這裡減輕你輕鬆週日午後的負擔。就是這個。 “鄧克效應是一種假設的認知偏差，也就是能力低下的人會高估自己的能力......這與虛幻優越感的認知偏差有關，來自人們無法認識到自己的能力不足。” 沒錯，這就是你知道那些心理學家會提出的那種複雜的廢話。不過簡而言之，這大致意味著：一些混蛋認為他們比實際上更聰明。 就在那個時候，華生醫生，我的調查範圍縮小了，從這個以人類殘骸形式存在的生物，在餐桌邊我腳下胡言亂語、滿頭大汗、怒髮衝冠咆哮的內容判斷，莫非，她說的是某個台灣甚至台北的當權者？ 因此，經過一整夜翻閱心理學書籍，同時以適當的福爾摩斯姿勢一直抽著煙斗......（我試圖靠在壁爐架上，同時看起來在沉思，但我們家只有冷氣，所以這沒有真正奏效）我知道有很多公司提供服務幫助領導能力有問題的人。 大致來說，以下要敘述的內容多數公司都同意，我從其中一個那裡拿了這個例子。我要感謝 Aubrey Daniels International (ADI)，特別是撰寫這篇文章的 Bryan Shelton。 ADI 提供領導力發展專業知識和行為技術，以改善企業及其文化。(利益揭露 － 我在過去和現在與 ADI 或 Bryan Shelton 都沒有任何關係......他們只是在我搜索時在螢幕上彈出來） 他們指出，擔任領導職位的人表現不佳的主要問題是： ★ 含糊其辭 ★ 在不了解結果是如何產生的情況下讚美結果 ★ 過度依賴恐懼和威脅 ★ 只從他們的角度看世界 你不必成為福爾摩斯，就可以弄清楚我們在這裡談論的是誰...... Tinkerty tonk… 掰掰

The Brits - Brave, Barmy, or Both?

As a journalist I was taught to never write a headline ending with a question mark because 99 times out of 100 the story you write will not answer the question. 

I’ve done it here because I mean it more as a rhetorical question. I’m genuinely puzzled at what Britain is doing with regards to Covid as I sit here in Taipei, secure in the knowledge the government has managed to get a small outbreak under control and there is not much to worry about. 

How would I feel if I was still living in Britain? Frankly terrified. If you look around the world, the evidence of the numbers and what is happening elsewhere, it really does reinforce how lucky we all are to be living here during this global emergency.

With so-called Freedom Day on Monday, Britain will lift all restrictions imposed during Covid. I can’t help but recall that famous poem by Alfred Tennyson about a suicidal cavalry charge during the Battle of Balaclava during the Crimean War.

The most quoted line is... Into the valley of Death. Rode the six hundred. But the poem also contains the line... “Forward, the Light Brigade!” Was there a man dismayed? Not though the soldier knew. Someone had blundered.

When you look at numbers it does appear the Government has blundered. Now it's promising Freedom Day to the population and it will end up being a disaster. Take a look at the UK numbers…

  

Now compare that with Taiwan...always remembering that the UK has only three times the population

So the latest figures for Thursday show new cases in Taiwan at 18 and the UK at 47,891.   

The worrying thing for Freedom Day is that huge spike in cases Britain is experiencing at the moment and it is that which is getting the scientists worried. 

Britain’s Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty warned yesterday that this spike in cases might mean the country is plunged into lockdown again in as soon as five weeks. There have been three UK lockdowns of varying degrees but it’s fair to say the country has been subjected to some form of lockdown for well over a year. Compare that to what we have experienced in Taiwan during the entire global pandemic in terms of impact to our daily lives.

Total UK Covid cases (adjusted for population difference) =  5,332,371(1,777,457)

Total Taiwan Covid cases = 15,390

Total UK Covid deaths (adjusted for population difference) = 128,642 (42,880)

Total Taiwan Covid deaths = 764

The British Government has rightly come in for some heavy criticism over its handling of Covid. A Prime Minister who caught it through his own stupidity and a sacked Health Minister who broke his own lockdown rules by groping his advisor in the office and trying to swallow her head. The whole thing has been an embarrassment for the Government. 

If you are unaware, the mop-haired idiot Boris Johnson boasted on May 5 last year...“I was at a hospital the other night where I think there were a few coronavirus patients and I shook hands with everybody, you will be pleased to know, and I continue to shake hands,” he said. “People obviously can make up their own minds but I think the scientific evidence is … our judgment is that washing your hands is the crucial thing.” 

This was on the very day his top scientific advisors told him shaking hands was a bad idea and he ended up in hospital with the virus. Many see Johnson as a fool, it’s easy to see why. 

My own feeling is on Monday a lot of Brits will head to the pubs, clubs, shops and restaurants and that top graph above will quickly start to look even worse in terms of the latest spike. 

Brave, Barmy, or Both? You see - it doesn’t work. Who knows at this stage? 

One thing I would say is anyone who looks at the evidence and openly states the Taiwan Government has done anything less than an excellent job in controlling the virus is either a fool or so politically motivated as to willingly ignore reality for purely political ends.

Sure, the one thing you can point to that Britain has done well is rolled out the vaccine with now over half the population covered. But if you look at the graph of new cases you have to wonder if that is actually making much of a difference. 

Taiwan has indeed not got close to what it needs to do in terms of the vaccine but most sensible people understand the huge issues Taiwan has with such things on the world stage. Many countries are struggling to secure enough vaccines, Taiwan is certainly not alone in that regard.

That said, Taiwan has just topped 20% of the population vaccinated which has happened very quickly.     

But I’m extremely glad I was here, not in the UK for the past 15 months.

Tinkerty Tonk..

《英國人 － 勇敢，愚蠢，還是兩者皆是？ 》 作為一名記者，我受的訓練告訴我不要寫以問號結尾的標題，因為這樣的新聞，100 則裡面有 99 則沒有答案。 現在我這麼寫，是因為這不過是個修辭罷了。當我四平八穩坐在淡水河畔的台北家中，我對我的母國應對新冠病毒方面的所作所為，其實是感到非常困惑的。尤其我知道台灣政府已經控制住一場小規模的疫情爆發，我沒有什麼可擔心。 如果我還住在英國，我會有什麼感覺？說實話會是嚇壞了。如果你環顧世界，看看疫情的數字傳達的證據，以及其他地方正在發生的事情，你應該更加確認在病毒危害全球之際，我們生活在台灣是多麼幸運。 明天是英國所謂的自由日 (Freedom Day)，政府將取消在 Covid 期間的所有限制。我不禁想起丁尼生 (Alfred Tennyson) 寫的那首關於克里米亞戰爭期間，巴拉克拉瓦戰役中騎兵自殺式衝鋒的名詩。 最常被引用的是：進入死亡之谷。六百騎兵。 這首詩也包含了這幾句：“前進吧，輕旅！” 有任何一個人感到沮喪嗎？騎兵們當然不知道。應該是有人搞錯了。 看看英國疫情數字，政府確實是搞錯了什麼吧？政府現在跟人們保證取消所有限制的自由日，但自由日終將成為一場災難。看看英國的數字……我們再看看台灣的數字……記住，英國的人口只有台灣的三倍。(圖表請見以下原文連結) 週四的最新數據顯示，台灣新增病例 18 例，英國新增病例 47,891 例。 自由日之下的事實是英國目前病例激增，而這讓科學家們感到擔憂。 英國首席醫療官惠緹 (Chris Whitty) 昨天發出警告，病例激增可能意味著最快五週之內，英國將再次進入封城狀態。到目前為止英國已經經歷三次不同程度的封城，也就是說過去一年多來，英國一直是在不同程度的封城之中渡過。 你可以比較在全球疫情大流行中，台灣日常生活受到什麼影響。 我手邊的數字顯示，英國確診數字為 5,332,371，三分之一是1,777,457，而台灣的確診數字為15,390。英國死亡病例為128,642，三分之一是 42,880，台灣死亡人數為 764。 英國政府處理 Covid 的政策遭受嚴厲的批評，這是理所當然的。 有個首相在疫情期間因自身的愚蠢而染疫，還有個衛生部長在違反自己的封城限令後下台，因為他在辦公室和他的女性顧問纏綿交頸親吻，幾乎要把她的頭吞下去一樣。這些再再都讓政府感到尷尬不已。 如果你不知道的話，那個拖把頭的白痴首相強生，去年 5 月 5 日大放厥詞：“那天晚上我拜訪了一家醫院，我想那裡有幾個冠狀病毒確診者，不過我和大家都握手了。你會很高興 知道，我繼續握手，”他說。 “人們應該可以做出自己的決定，但我認為科學證據是……我們認為洗手是非常重要的。” 就在同一天，他的頂尖科學顧問告訴他握手不是個好主意，然後他因感染病毒而住院。許多人認為強生是個傻瓜，應該很容易理解為什麼。 我自己的感覺是，週一會有很多英國人前往酒吧、俱樂部、商店和餐館，而上面那個英國疫情圖表，很快就會開始變得更糟。 勇敢，愚蠢，或是兩者都是？ 不會是這樣的，但是現階段誰知道究竟是前者或是後者？ 我要說的是，任何看到全球疫情的證據，還要公開表示台灣政府在控制病毒方面做得不夠出色的人，要不是傻瓜，就是出於某種政治動機，蓄意忽視現實以達到他們的政治目的。 當然你可以指出英國做得很好的一件事，是推出疫苗並且為超過一半以上的人口施打疫苗。但是如果你再看看最新的曲線圖，你也不免要懷疑這是否真的產生了很大的不同。 台灣在疫苗的供應方面確實和應做到的還很遠，但大多數明智的人都明白，台灣在國際間面臨了什麼樣的巨大問題。許多國家都還在辛苦地設法取得足夠的疫苗，在這方面台灣不是唯一。但即使如此，我聽說台灣剛剛為超過 20% 的人口接種疫苗，而且這個比例發生得非常快。 我非常高興過去的 17 個月我在台灣，而不是在英國。 Tinkerty Tonk... 掰掰。

Danish Siddiqui - RIP

SPIN BOLDAK, Afghanistan, July 16 (Reuters) - Reuters journalist Danish Siddiqui was killed on Friday while covering a clash between Afghan security forces and Taliban fighters near a border crossing with Pakistan, an Afghan commander said.

Afghan special forces had been fighting to retake the main market area of Spin Boldak when Siddiqui and a senior Afghan officer were killed in what they described as Taliban crossfire, the official told Reuters.

Siddiqui had been embedded as a journalist since earlier this week with Afghan special forces based in the southern province of Kandahar and had been reporting on fighting between Afghan commandos and Taliban fighters.

-------------------------------------------------------------

I've just heard this news from my old Reuters colleagues. I know this blog is not supposed to be my personal space but I felt it was appropriate to pass on this news in the spirit of good journalism.

Danish worked for me when I was running the South Asia region and his passing is a great tragedy.

Please spare a thought for his family and friends, but also for agency journalists the world over who strive to bring you the news, pictures and video, and the unvarnished truth.

Here are some of his recent images...

路透社 7 月 16 日，阿富汗斯賓博爾達克（路透社）——一名阿富汗指揮官說，路透社記者丹麥西迪基週五在報導阿富汗安全部隊和塔利班武裝分子在與巴基斯坦邊境附近發生的衝突時被殺。 這位官員告訴路透社，當西迪基和一名阿富汗高級官員在他們所謂的塔利班交火中喪生時，阿富汗特種部隊一直在為奪回斯平博爾達克的主要市場區域而戰。 自本週早些時候以來，西迪基一直擔任駐紮在南部坎大哈省的阿富汗特種部隊的一名記者，並一直在報導阿富汗突擊隊與塔利班戰士之間的戰鬥。 -------------------------------------------------- ----------- 我剛剛從路透社的老同事那裡聽到了這個消息。 我知道這不應該是我的個私人空間，但我覺得本著良好的新聞精神傳遞這個消息是合適的。 當我管理南亞地區時，Danish 為我工作，他的去世是一個巨大的悲劇。 我要請你們花一點時間為他的家人和朋友，以及全世界努力為您帶來新聞、圖片和視頻以及不加修飾的真相的機構記者致意。

Hitting the Ceiling

Yet again, I was down in the car park this morning getting the ladder we keep there to get Mrs Smith down from among the light fittings and ceiling fan.

Imagine my surprise, well lack of it, when I was told it was due to something coming from the office of that Guru of the City, AKA The Master, AKA Doc, and by most people AKA “Oh him, what’s his name again?” 

It would appear that a certain ex-nurse had dipped into her copy of ‘Slagging Off An Opposition Party for Dummies’ and come up with the less than bright idea of launching yet another vaccine attack on Tsai-san. 

To be honest, this line is starting to smack a bit of panic, and the realization that there is little to criticize the Government on about the pandemic. This time, she pointed out that Taiwan was not immunising under 12-year olds. 

When confronted on the matter, she came back with a massive non-zinger by pointing to a newspaper article saying some pharmaceutical companies were looking at vaccines for the under 12s but that all this was still in a development phase. Er…..looking…. In a development phase?  

Now I may not be the sharpest knife in the kitchen drawer, but that kind of begs the question if something is in development. How can you say countries are actually lining up kids and sticking needles in their arms.

I looked around and the only thing I could find was that China has approved emergency use (note the use of Emergency Use) of Sinovac Biotech’s COVID-19 vaccine in people aged between three and 17. 

I looked further and really could not find any evidence of countries actually vaccinating young children against Covid. 

Maybe said nurse has other evidence. If so, please publish it as it’s BIG news. 

Quite frankly, it’s worrying that an ex-head nurse doesn’t know the difference between healthcare products in development and those that have been approved.

It’s just as well she has apparently found another way to make a living as I’d not like to entrust her to my kid’s health, or mine come to that. 

What also troubles me is this kind of idiotic Yah-boo sucks attempt at playing a political game by morons who don’t know what they are doing that is not only dangerous, but a worryingly growing trend in Taiwan. 

Like a high-wire act. Only a dimwit with a bloated sense of their own importance would attempt such a thing if they were not an expert. 

Likewise politics. If you are to indulge in politics, first you should make sure you don’t immediately contradict what you are saying. 

Maybe I should ask the publishers if they would like me to write an update for Tips for Political Opposition for Dummies. It might be worth a few bob. 

Tinkerty Tonk      

《又氣到衝上天花板了！》

今天早上我又得到大樓地下室停車場，把我們放在那裡的梯子拿上樓，以便將怒氣沖天的史密斯太太從天花板的燈具和吊扇中拉下來。

當我的太太告訴我，也就是這個城市大師 aka 師父 aka 醫師 aka 哦他呀那個誰的陣營又出了什麼事的時候，你可以想見我的驚訝，但其實說真的，我完全不驚訝。

好像是他的陣營裡某位護理師把她的頭埋進那本《如何攻擊政敵之白痴指南》，結果她推出了一個不太聰明的想法，就是再度對蔡桑發動疫苗攻擊。 

老實說這個攻擊點出他們有點不知所措，因為他們似乎意識到沒有什麼可以批評政府的防疫政策了，於是她暗示台灣沒有疫苗給12歲以下的兒童。

當有人質疑她的言論時，她報以蒼白無力的反擊，就是指著一篇新聞報導說，一些製藥公司正在研究如何為 12 歲以下的兒童施打疫苗，這一切都還在測試階段，呃……你看…… 處於測試階段。

(譯者註：質疑她的國家一級泡茶師臉書頁已被檢舉刪除，因此這個留言已經消失)

好吧，我承認我可能不是廚房抽屜裡最鋒利的那把刀，不是什麼聰明絕頂的人，但如果你說有什麼東西正在研發中，你就該好好想一下那是什麼意思，能說是一些國家正在把這些孩子叫來排隊，在他們的手臂上扎一針嗎？

我環顧四周，唯一能找到的例子是中國已批准為 3 至 17 歲的人緊急（注意這是緊急使用）施打 Sinovac Biotech 的 COVID-19 疫苗。再進一步查看，除此之外我沒有看見證據其他國家已經在為兒童接種 Covid 疫苗。

也許這位護理師有其他證據，如果是這樣就應該趕快發布，因為那可是大新聞。

坦白說這是令人擔憂的，一名前護理師不知道醫療產品尚在研發階段與已獲批准之間的區別。幸好她已經找到了另一種謀生方式，因為如果我有孩子的話，我可不想把他們的健康託付給她。

同樣讓我煩惱的是，一些蠢蛋推出中二政治把戲，而他們根本不知道自己在做什麼。這不僅危險，也是令人擔憂的趨勢。

就像是走高空繩索的表演，如果不是專家就不該貿然嘗試，只有把自己的重要性膨脹到無限大的笨蛋，才會嘗試空中走繩。

政治也是一樣的，如果你要沉迷於政治，首先你應該確保你不會立即反駁你自己所說過的事。

也許我應該問問出版商，他們是否希望我為他們重寫一本《反對黨技巧之白痴指南》，這可能可以幫他們賺幾個錢。

Tinkerty Tonk 掰掰！